It All Rests With This Generation

By Homeland Chief Jay Johnson
The recent six page memo concerning immigration by Homeland Chief Jay Johnson needs to be thoroughly evaluated.  The memo grants amnesty to any illegal alien who has been here as of January 1, 2014.  So it’s not just  the five million no faults the president talked about in  his executive order speech.   It’s absolutely  everybody who has been in this country illegally from 1986 to January 1, 2014.   There is no way to know for certain just how many millions are here illegally.  It could be 15, 20 or 30 million.  The border has been wide open for 29 years so there’s no telling how many.

As for the no faults, and if there are truly  no more than five million of them, that’s not an accurate number either.  Their two parents and their three or four siblings, better known as anchor babies, have to be included in the count.  That brings it up to 35 million. 5 million no faults    10 million parents   20 million anchor babies, yep anchor babies.    And the next generation,  counting children, average 5 per family,   parents  and   grandparents, will be 160 million.    10 million grandparents   25 million parents     125 million children.    And the next generation will number 775 million, three quarters of one billion.  25 million grandparents    125 million parents    625 million children.    These are the children and grandchildren of the illegal aliens having amnesty bestowed upon them now.   And that’s just counting 5 million no faults.  And the next generation will be even greater.

This does not count the one million legal immigrants the US takes in every year. Add another billion for them and the millions upon millions of their children and grandchildren and all the refugees and asylum seekers and the millions of their children and grandchildren.  Nor does it include all the millions who will continue to come here illegally because the border will never be secured with a fence after this amnesty,  nor the millions upon million of their children and grandchildren.  Nor does it count all these bring in through chain migration, nor the millions of their children and grandchildren.   Count all these plus the existing population and the United States will have more than twice, possibly three times the  population of China.   Presently China weighs in at 1.35 billion, one billion, three hundred and thirty five million.

The United States is right now at a tipping point concerning immigration and  overpopulation.   Exactly what the late Senator Barbara Jordan warned would happen if the government did not keep a tight rein on illegal and legal immigration.  Her words, ‘tight rein’.   Either those we have elected do something now to prevent the United States from becoming as  overpopulated as China and India or it will never be done.  Tomorrow is too late.

All they need is this one last amnesty.  Future generations powerless to turn it around.  It all rests on this generation.  On the shoulders of every United States citizen, every Democrat, every Republican, every Libertarian, every Independent and even every citizen with no political persuasion at all,  and on  the shoulders of those we have elected to run our government.

Common Core and UN Agenda 21: Mass Producing Green Global Serfs

Thursday, 27 March 2014

As the Obama administration, Bill Gates, the United Nations, and other forces seek to finalize the decades-old effort to nationalize — and even globalize — education by bribing and bludgeoning state governments to imposeCommon Core, one of the key agendas behind the deeply controversial standards has been largely overlooked. In essence, official UN documents and statements by top administration officials reveal a plan to transform American children, and students around the globe, into what globalists refer to as “global citizens” ready for the coming “green” and “sustainable” world order.

In recent years especially, UN reports and top world leaders have been openly boasting of their globalist plot to create a top-down, planned, and regimented society that is completely at odds with the U.S. Constitution, national sovereignty, individual liberty, God-given rights, Judeo-Christian values, and Western traditions. A major component of the scheme surrounds so-called “sustainability”and a radical UN program known as Agenda 21 encompassing virtually every facet of life. To prepare humanity for their vision, however, requires a new form of “education,” globalists admit. UNESCO calls it “Education for Sustainable Development.”

On its website, UNESCO, the self-styled global education agency, actually boasts of its plans. “The UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (2005-2014) seeks to mobilize the educational resources of the world to help create a more sustainable future,” the UN outfit explains. “Many paths to sustainability … exist and are mentioned in the 40 chapters of Agenda 21, the official document of the 1992 Earth Summit. Education is one of these paths. Education alone cannot achieve a more sustainable future; however, without education and learning for sustainable development, we will not be able to reach that goal.”

Before the term “sustainability” was in vogue, the late UN Deputy Secretary General Robert Muller, the architect of UNESCO’s “World Core Curriculum,” also offered some insight into the purpose of UN-led, globalized pseudo-education. The goals: “Assisting the child in becoming an integrated individual who can deal with personal experience while seeing himself as a part of ‘the greater whole.’ In other words, promote growth of the group idea, so that group good, group understanding, group interrelations and group goodwill replace all limited, self-centered objectives, leading to group consciousness.” Put another way, smash individualism and notions of individual rights, replacing them with collectivism.

Meanwhile, actually educating children in the traditional sense — teaching them reading, writing, critical thinking, math, real history, actual science, and more — is on its way out, as globalists openly admit in official documents and all across UN websites. In its place, UNESCO, Bill Gates, the Obama administration, and other powerful globalist forces are working quietly but fiendishly to impose global education standards on humanity. Among other schemes is a UN plot known as the “World Core Curriculum” that has been in the works for decades.

(For additional information on planetary efforts to standardize schooling, please see “UN, Obama, and Gates Are Globalizing Education Via Common Core.”)

So what will children learn in the “green” world order? In a 2010 speech at a “Sustainability Summit,” Obama Education Secretary Arne Duncan offered more than a few hints. Openly proclaiming the administration’s loyalty to the globalist UN “sustainability” agenda, Duncan boasts of how the U.S. government is foisting it all on American children via the Common Core national standards and a wide range of related federal and international programs.

In fact, he said, the U.S. Department of Education “is taking a leadership role in the work of educating the next generation of green citizens and preparing them to contribute to the workforce through green jobs.” Obama’s former “Green Jobs” Czar, Van Jones, of course, was eventually forced to resign after his own words exposed him as a self-described “communist.” The notion of a centrally planned, UN-directed “green” economy and “green” world order, however, never went anywhere. As Duncan makes clear, central planners will determine what jobs citizens will have, and central planners will train them accordingly.

Of course, the unconstitutional federal education bureaucracy is not alone in the plot to transform America’s youth, Duncan continued, pointing to numerous other U.S. agencies and departments that “have made important contributions linking education and sustainability.” In the United States, like the imposition of Common Core on state governments, Duncan explained that much of the federal effort to indoctrinate young Americans into the “sustainable development” agenda is being funded by the so-called “stimulus” plan.

At the global level, the World Bank, multiple UN agencies, Big Labor, Big Business, tax-funded so-called “non-governmental organizations,” and more are all involved in harmonizing and globalizing education as well. As Duncan made clear in a separate 2010 speech to UNESCO, the Obama administration is fully on board with the planetary schemes as well. “Our goal for the coming year will be to work closely with global partners, including UNESCO, to promote qualitative improvements and system-strengthening,” he said, quoting former South African President Nelson Mandela to add that education “is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.”

With the Obama administration as well as the nationalization and globalization of education via Common Core, domestic efforts will only intensify as well. “Historically, the Department of Education hasn’t been doing enough in the sustainability movement,” Duncan explained in his speech, omitting the fact that the federal government has been lawlessly pushing similar schemes to transform and undermine values on U.S. schools for decades now — under Republican and Democrat presidential administrations. “Today, I promise you that we will be a committed partner in the national effort to build a more environmentally literate and responsible society.”

The new “green” world order will be imposed using federal power over schools, Duncan re-iterated in the speech. “We must advance the sustainability movement through education,” he explained, perhaps unaware that the vast majority of parents send their children to school to be educated, not to advance the sustainability movement. “We at the Education Department are energized about joining these leaders in their commitment to preparing today’s students to participate in the green economy, and to be well-educated about the science of sustainability.”

The language may sound innocent enough to those who know little or nothing about what globalists mean when they refer to “sustainability” and the “green economy.” After all, taxpayers unwittingly spent many millions of dollars on “focus groups” and “market research” to help the schemers conceal the true agenda by identifying language and terms that the public would be most likely to embrace. But what exactly is it that Duncan, UNESCO, Common Core, and the Obama administration admit they are training your children to participate in?

In essence, according to UN documents and reports, the idea is to re-structure human civilization into a centrally planned global society under the control of international institutions such as the UN — all under the guise of “sustainable development.” In fact, they say so themselves in countless reports and documents; even though, ironically enough, central planning has always and everywhere produced environmental devastation in addition to human misery.

Official UN documents show, for example, that under the “green economy” banner, literally everything about human existence must dramatically change: Lifestyles, opinions, education, health, consumption, production, agriculture, diet, law, taxation, industry, governance, and much more. “Transitioning to a green economy requires a fundamental shift in the way we think and act,” explains a 2012 UN report entitled “Working towards a Balanced and Inclusive Green Economy.” A more recent UN report, developed with help from Obama policy architect John Podesta, noted that the “worldview and behavior” of every person on Earth must be “dramatically altered.”

On the other hand, national sovereignty, individual liberty, free markets, unalienable rights, traditional values, self-government, Biblical Christianity, and more must all be pushed aside. “But our commitment has to be about even more than career pathways,” explained U.S. Education boss Duncan, sounding like a Soviet commissar claiming that schools must “prepare workers” for jobs in the new green world order. “It also has to prepare all students with the knowledge they need to be green citizens.”

To that end, Duncan continued in his speech at the “Sustainability Summit,” the Obama administration is working to “build the science of sustainability into the curriculum, starting in kindergarten and extending until the students graduate from high school.” While the Common Core standards and related establishment schemes are solidifying that in the United States, the same phenomenon is taking place at break-neck speed around the world.

At the 2012 UN “Conference on Sustainable Development” in Rio, for instance — chaired by an anti-American Chinese Communist — virtually every national government on Earth committed to do what Duncan described in the countries they rule. “We therefore resolve to improve the capacity of our education systems to prepare people to pursue sustainable development, including through enhanced teacher training, the development of curricula around sustainability, the development of training programs that prepare students for careers in fields related to sustainability,” reads the text of the final agreement, dubbed “The Future We Want.” The “we,” of course, refers to the legions of bureaucrats, dictators, presidents, and mass-murderers at the UN sustainability summit — not the public.

Traditional and classical notions of education, however, have no place in the sustainable “green” world order. In a stunning admission posted directly on UNESCO’s website in a document about the agency’s “Education for Sustainable Development” machinations, the outfit makes that abundantly clear. “Generally, more highly educated people, who have higher incomes, consume more resources than poorly educated people, who tend to have lower incomes,” the UN “toolkit” for global “sustainable” education explains. “In this case, more education increases the threat to sustainability.”

Read that sentence again, and again: More education threatens their vision of “sustainability” (as do freedom, prosperity, humans, and more). Lest there be any doubt about the purpose of Common Core, the broader globalist vision for education, and the fact that it has been burrowing its way into U.S. schools for decades, consider a 1989 speech given to the federally funded National Governor’s Association — the unaccountable D.C.-based trade group that helped develop and impose Common Core on America — by a prominent player in the “reform” movement under contract with the U.S. Department of Education.

“What is happening in America today and what is happening to Kansas in the Great Plains is not simply a chance situation in the usual winds of change. What it amounts to is a total transformation of our society,” Dr. Shirley McCune, a senior official with a little-known education outfit involved in writing national standards, told the governors. “So we have to anticipate what the future is and then move back and figure out what it is we need to do today. That’s called anticipatory socialization or the social change function of schools.” Governors applauded.

Dr. McCune, who also worked with the National Education Association, the U.S. Department of Education, and more, was not shy about sharing the long-term agenda with the nation’s governors. “You have to understand the breadth of the task that’s before us,” she continued. “You cannot think about restructuring of education without understanding that our total society is in a crisis of restructuring and you can’t get away from it … what we are facing is a total restructuring of the society.”

Some two decades after that speech, following a long series of federal and international programs to pave the way, Common Core was officially born. It was developed by establishment forces infamous for openly advocating the nationalization of schooling, with funding from prominent globalists, and using federal bribes to foist it on states. So far, some 45 state governments have imposed the poor-quality national standards in exchange for “stimulus”-funded bribes and threats.

With the ongoing globalization of education under UN and Obama administration guidance, Americans are at a crossroads. One alternative is putting a stop to it all now, withdrawing from Common Core, rejecting unconstitutional federal bribes and mandates, and restoring proper education to promote a well-educated citizenry capable of critical thinking and maintaining liberty. The other option, as globalist voices have made clear, is a “green” economy — and everything that radical vision entails. Choose wisely.

Alex Newman is a correspondent for The New American, covering economics, education, politics, and more. He can be reached at

. Follow him on Twitter @ALEXNEWMAN_JOU.

Related articles:

UN, Obama, and Gates Are Globalizing Education Via Common Core

Common Core: A Scheme to Rewrite Education

Orwellian Nightmare: Data-mining Your Kids

The Real Agenda Behind UN “Sustainability” Unmasked

UN Academic Impact Joins CFR to Infiltrate U.S. Classrooms

Debunking Myth of Common Core Education as “State Led” (Video)

Achievement of UNESCO’s Agenda Stalled by Loss of U.S. Funding

UNESCO’s Rotten Track Record

UN Plotting to “Dramatically Alter” Your Views and Behavior

UN Seeks New Powers to Remake World at Rio Sustainability Summit

UN Bosses Secretly Plot Global Govt Through “Green Economy” for Rio+20

Exposing the Green World Order

UN Plans $45 Trillion Cost for “Going Green”

Why Indiana must Pass a Freedom of Conscience and Religion Bill

Why Indiana must Pass a Freedom of Conscience and Religion Bill

By Monica Boyer from Warsaw and Kosciusko Silent No More

I wrote an article explaining the need for an Indiana Religious Freedom Restoration Act.  I released a blog today explaining why we need this, and how we support it.  I also am attaching a legal brief for you.

The common misconception is that this is only about marriage.  It is not.  Right here in Warsaw, we are dealing with a city ordinance that if passed, would chase the Amish away. I am intentionally steering the conversation away from marriage.  I know it’s a hot topic and we can use it but sparingly. This bill is so much bigger.

Make sure you watch the video in the blog. It will bring you to tears. I actually had a note exchange with them today.  We probably don’t agree with much of anything politically or spiritually, but we do agree about freedom. They were two of the kindest ladies I’ve ever spoken to.

Please make sure you pray for Senator Schneider.  He is a very courageous man for carrying this.  The only way it will be heard is if Senator Long allows it to come to the floor.  The official bill is not posted yet, but as soon as it is, I will send you a copy.   Please let me know if I can answer any questions. If I don’t know the answer we have attorneys that will get us the answers.  Remember… its all about FREEDOM.

Here is the link:  Why Indiana MUST pass a Freedom of Conscience and Religion Bill.

freedom of conscience

Why Indiana MUST pass a Freedom of Conscience and Rel…
If you read the news this week, when Senator Scott Schneider announced his intention to file the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, (you will also hear it entitled…

View on www.monicaboyer.com

I’ll be updating the Indiana Coalition to protect Religious Freedom Facebook page with any updates.

https://www.facebook.com/INCoalition4religiousfreedom

Legal Brief  Indiana RFRA Memo

With Firm Reliance on Divine Providence…

Monica Boyer
Kosciusko Silent NO More
Author of “Not on My Watch”
www.monicaboyer.com 

Harvard Profs Taste Their Own Obamacare Medicine; Don’t Like It

Bob Allen

Obamacare has come to the Harvard Profs and they are angry at having to suffer under their own “genius.”

Harvard

I know I shouldn’t laugh… I really shouldn’t. It’s simply sad, but… it provides me with at least a tiny ray of hope that perhaps… just perhaps… a few of them with finally awaken from their mental captivity to nonsense. I know… it’s a long-shot, but I can hope.

From the New York Times: “Harvard Ideas on Health Care Hit Home, Hard.”

Members of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, the heart of the 378-year-old university, voted overwhelmingly in November to oppose changes that would require them and thousands of other Harvard employees to pay more for health care. The university says the increases are in part a result of the Obama administration’s Affordable Care Act, which many Harvard professors championed.

The faculty vote came too late to stop the cost increases from taking effect this month, and the anger on campus remains focused on questions that are agitating many workplaces: How should the burden of health costs be shared by employers and employees? If employees have to bear more of the cost, will they skimp on medically necessary care, curtail the use of less valuable services, or both?

“Harvard is a microcosm of what’s happening in health care in the country,” said David M. Cutler, a health economist at the university who was an adviser to President Obama’s 2008 campaign. But only up to a point: Professors at Harvard have until now generally avoided the higher expenses that other employers have been passing on to employees. That makes the outrage among the faculty remarkable, Mr. Cutler said, because “Harvard was and remains a very generous employer.”

This is what happens when Ivory Tower Progressive Unicorn fantasies meet the hard and unforgiving road of economic and human reality.

The Harvard faculty screams: No! We will not live in the real world! Not fair! Give us back our illusions! This reality does not match up with our academic theories and the strong delusion which drives us onward!